TTHINRIDGE Your reports What passed Test a setup

The shelf · Yesterday's high or low · Gold

Does yesterday's high or low work on GC? Eighteen years, tested

Failed
35 /100

The rule as it ran

Prior-day sweep, fade or follow. Run on GC, the Gold.

excursion 0.1; sustain 10; hold 60; window 0930-1130; mode fade; sides Both

One trade a day, the first signal in the window, on one-minute bars, with one tick of slippage each way and commission. Trades dated 2023 or later are the seen era; the years before decide the verdict. Tested September 15, 2026, under SHELF-01.

953trades, 18.5 years
-$14,199net after costs, -$15 a trade
34 / 5,000coin flips that matched or beat it on the years before 2023
8 of 15years before 2023 that made money
65 monthslongest wait for a new equity high
0.0 ticksa side, where the rule reaches zero

Nothing in this record points at one thing to do differently by eye; the rule as written is what it is.

That is what the record says about the rule as written. It is not what next year says.

Test your version, freeOn the form, $49Change a setting, the market or the exit, in a sentence. The first run is free and read back to you line by line before it runs; the form runs it tonight for $49. Published either way.
Yesterday's high or low on GC, chart equityYesterday's high or low on GC, chart nullYesterday's high or low on GC, chart years
The engine's report, in full
==============================================================
THINRIDGE ENGINE REPORT  -  SCORED UNDER PROTOCOL v1.1
==============================================================

SCOPE: Scored under Protocol v1.1 on FirstRate 1-min unadjusted via Thinridge engine. Intake testimony: NOT received (rule tested as locked). Contamination map sworn: no (seen era as declared or by archive date). Human review of reconciliation residue: NO.

1. THE RULE AS LOCKED
   family      : D - Yesterday's high or low
   as you locked it:
     Yesterday's high or low, at the settings the door shows before anyone touches them (SHELF-01 v1.1): excursion 0.1; sustain 10; hold 60; window 0930-1130; mode fade; sides Both
     seen era from 2023, the split the six teardowns were scored on
   as the engine read it:
   exit model  : time only
   filter      : none
   lineage     : #1
   bars        : one-minute (every signal, fill and exit is on the one-minute series)
   entries     : one trade a day, the first qualifying signal in the window
   history     : 18.5 years, seen era = 2023 onward (declared by submitter, not sworn)
               : trades dated 2023 or later are the seen era; trades before 2023 are the unseen era, and the unseen era decides the verdict

2. VERDICT
   SCORE   : 35 / 100
   VERDICT : REJECTED
   CRATERS : pillar(s) below 50%: II, V, VI
   Pillars : I=5  II=3  III=13  IV=12  V=0  VI=2

3. RESULT
   Trades 953   Net -$14,198.60   Per trade -$14.90
   Seen era (2023+): 206 trades, -$30,645.20
   Unseen era    : 747 trades, $16,446.60
   Win rate 47.0%  (448 of 953 trades closed above zero after costs)
   Exits by type: time 953

4. THE NULL (random-side twins, 5000 seeds)
   Full window  p = 0.3550  (1775 / 5000)
   Unseen era   p = 0.0068  (34 / 5000)   <- governs
   Lineage-adjusted p (variant #1) = 0.0068

5. ERA CONSISTENCY (unseen calendar years as windows)
   Years 15   profitable 8   WF efficiency (PF unseen/seen) 1.70
   Largest year 2021 = 46.8% of unseen-era net
   By year (unseen): 2008 -$221.60  2009 -$5,322.80  2010 $6,896.00  2011 -$4,368.40  2012 $6,006.40  2013 $4,330.00  2014 $2,448.40  2015 -$1,216.80  2016 -$3,345.80  2017 $3,334.60  2018 -$1,047.00  2019 $523.00  2020 $3,410.00  2021 $7,689.00  2022 -$2,668.40

6. COST STRESS (re-simulated)
   1 tick -$14,198.60   2 ticks -$33,258.60   3 ticks -$52,318.60
   Net/gross at 1 tick -160.2%   PF at 2x friction 0.83   Breakeven 0.0 ticks/side

7. FRAGILITY (bootstrap x5000)
   Full   CI -$58,097.60 .. $29,632.40   P(net>0) 0.2658
   Unseen CI -$10,745.40 .. $44,313.60   P(net>0) 0.8814
   DD95/actual 1.13x   Top trade n/a   Top-5 n/a

8. SENSITIVITY (+-10% on primary trigger)
   Plateau retention 0%   Sign flip YES   Parameters 5

9. LIVABILITY (no points; could a person have held this?)
   Longest stretch without a new equity high: 65 months (ending 2020-07)
   Rolling 12-month windows negative: 46% of 213   Worst 12 months: -$31,245.20 (ending 2026-03)
   Max drawdown $37,452.20   Median year -$221.60   Years of median to recoup the drawdown: n/a (median year not positive)

10. CODE OFFER
   [ ] validated
   [x] unseen_p_adj_le_0.05
   [ ] unseen_ci_excludes_zero
   [ ] breakeven_ge_4_ticks
   [ ] top_trade_le_25pct
   => not offered at this result.

11. SCORING LINES
   II: Sharpe retention 0.0 (per-trade) -> 0; absolute OOS -> 3
   III: windows profitable 0.53 -> 3; efficiency 1.7 -> 8; window concentration -> 2
   IV: null p 0.0068 (5000 seeds) -> 8; DD95/BT 1.13 -> 4; top trade n/a -> 0
   V: retention@1x -1.602 -> 0; PF@2x 0.83 -> 0
   VI: plateau 0.0 -> 0; parsimony 5 -> 2; sign flip True -> 0

12. THE AUTOPSY (where the money came from and went; the rule as it ran, no new try)
   Exits: time 953, -$14,198.60
   On the books, unseen era (net $16,446.60): 10:00 $2,829.60  11:00 $17,156.00  12:00 $13,706.60  13:00 $16,446.60  14:00 $16,446.60  15:00 $16,446.60
   Share of the unseen money after 12:00: 17%; after 14:00: 0%
   Eras: unseen $16,446.60, seen -$30,645.20; largest unseen year 2021 = 47% of the unseen net
   Plateau: 0% retained on a 10% nudge; sign flip yes
   Drought: 65 months without a new high (ending 2020-07); median year -$221.60; years of median to recoup n/a

   The money was made by noon: 83% of the unseen-era money was on the books by 12:00. The numbers are a spike: a 10% nudge either way keeps 0% of the result. Longest wait for a new equity high: 65 months, median year -$221.60.
   The one next run, if you want it: the clock exit at 12:00, as lineage #2. Prediction on file: within 20% of the unseen net with the afternoon's give-back removed; 83% of the money was on the books by then. Three such runs at most, then the verdict stands.

13. IF YOU TRADE THIS BY EYE
   Nothing in this record points at one thing to do differently by eye; the rule as written is what it is.
   That is what the record says about the rule as written. It is not what next year says.

WHAT THIS CANNOT TELL YOU: the score assumes this rule walked in
once (see lineage) and that your development did not touch the
unseen era. Neither was sworn. A Thinridge audit exists to take
that testimony. Not investment advice. No guarantee of future
results. Statistical analysis of a mechanical rule as submitted.
==============================================================

Raw market data: FirstRate Data (firstratedata.com). Statistical analysis of a mechanical rule as written; not advice.