What to send
The rule the way the seller says it. “Buy the first close above the opening range, out at the bell” is enough; so is the code, if you have it (NinjaScript or Python; other languages are read by hand). If it’s a course, send the setup the way it’s taught, and where the teaching leaves a choice open, say what you’d do; the Silver Bullet page shows what that looks like written down. If the seller won’t tell you the rule, that is your answer, and it cost nothing.
What comes back
One report: a score from 0 to 100 and a verdict; what the rule did on the years nobody tuned it on; how many of 5,000 random-direction twins did as well; how much slippage it survives; how much of the money came from one trade or one year; and the longest stretch you’d have sat without a new high. Five of the six pages below are this report; the first, the engulfing candle, was run by hand before the engine existed, and its page says so.
Where this fits
Between the day you first see a setup work and the day you put real size on it. Most traders test with money, small at first, and scale what holds. This is the step in the middle: eighteen years of it, before the small size, for less than one losing trade.
Six famous setups, already run
The bullish engulfing candle, as taught: 2,853 trades on ES, rejected 16/100, the hand study that started the series.
The 15-minute opening range breakout: 4,708 trades on NQ, rejected 28/100, the edge all since 2023.
The premarket reversion: 709 trades on NQ, validated 90/100, and 46 months without a new high.
The Keltner channel fade: 4,801 trades on NQ, rejected 11/100, never above zero.
The ORB on Fridays only: 925 trades, validated 85/100, found by looking, so no code.
The ICT Silver Bullet, written as a rule: 2,372 trades, rejected 13/100, 14 of 15 test years lost.
What it can’t do
It can’t test a read. If the edge is “you’ll know it when you see it,” there is no rule to run, and no test on earth can score that except your own account. It can’t know what the seller left out. And a rule that passes here can still be one you’d quit on in a slow year; the report shows you those years so that’s your decision, not a surprise.
$49. One report, paid before it runs, refunded if the engine can’t finish.
Questions people ask
Do you review courses or bots? No. We run the rule inside them. A review is an opinion; this is 18 years of trades.
What if the seller won’t give me the rule? Then you’re being sold a read, not a rule, and nothing can test a read. That’s worth knowing before the card goes through.
Will my result be published? Only if you ask. The report goes to your email and stays there.
What if I trade it with a stop and a target? Say so. Stops and targets are part of the rule and get tested with it; on the Silver Bullet the usual 10-point stop made it worse.